Comments on: Perry Marshall – Cosmic Fingerprints – Intelligent Design

By: John Natterstad

John Natterstad — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:24:55 +0000

Browsing posts to this site is discouraging. All ignore that the Genesis 1 creation was lost as a return to chaos by its Creator. The resuting planets “prove” a 4.5 billion year lapse from the “very good” at 7 AU to the world we know.

By: Dushun

Dushun — Tue, 06 Sep 2011 05:18:30 +0000

If the origin of the entire dispute is genesis 1, I’ll say this,
A Firmament is the resolve. It is the visible verification that declares the truth of God’s testament, His hands work. Our inability to clearly see the firmament however, is the dilemma to our unity. It has been lost in translation and we have fallen away to the origin of the universe as if it is the proclamation of His account.
The statement of faith is God of the universe, meaning; He created the universe in X amount of days. But not according to the source of the entire dispute, that has become the great debate and a public display of controversy, speculation and confusion that ‘truth’ would not be the author of.
Consider this; regardless of ‘how’ the origin of the universe became; whether it evolved or whether a God created it, either way, it only evolved to a huge formless and void mass of rock, suspended in space, covered entirely with water, from which the documented record of the account begins…
Therefore, the true question is this: What are we believing a God to have made, relevant to our existence here on this planet He called the ‘dry’ earth? It can’t be the universe…
Because until or unless a firmament was made in the midst of the waters (an alleged mystery) this huge mass of rock would STILL be formless and void, suspended in space under water and furthermore, in a state or condition that was impossible to sustain life as we know it here on this planet to date, thereby rendering mans history nonexistent.
Anything prior to this divide is irrelevant to the possibility of mans inhabitance. Nor is there any such record to testify of anything prior to this formless and void condition of the planet or the universe…
The firmament is the visible verification that declares the beginning of the creation of the heaven and the earth; not the universe.
This is just a brief intro of what this information has to reveal, that was stumbled across at firmament-theresolve.com
Thank you for your time.
Dushun

By: Lynda Osborne

Lynda Osborne — Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:43:43 +0000

Oh Yeah? Then you haven’t had the opportunity of experiencing an encounter. Many people have. Some people’s lives are so concentrated with other different things, that they won’t recognize angelic happenings when they occur. Some people apparently don’t get any.

By: Shanon

Shanon — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:56:10 +0000

The problem with your question, Gailstrail, is that the laws of physics don’t create information. Therefore, because information is what makes biology possible, and the laws of physics don’t create information, biology will NEVER be created by mistake. Sorry, but this question is invalid.

By: Jack

Jack — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:03:24 +0000

This man really does not know what he is talking about. Scientists can explain the origins of life very adequately. I suggest you watch the 5 videos in this series. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg&NR=1

By: Michelle Vandepas

Michelle Vandepas — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:27:28 +0000

Part 2 coming next week Peter!

By: Peter Knight

Peter Knight — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:13:30 +0000

Would love to see a part two!

By: Tom Stine

Tom Stine — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:04:16 +0000

Perry’s viewpoints remind me of Amit Goswami. He takes a nice causal approach to much of life and spirituality, coming from quantum physics but similar. Cool stuff!

Tom

By: Perry Marshall

Perry Marshall — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:18:18 +0000

@Gailstrail:

I am totally open to the possibility that the same laws of physics that make snowflakes also make life. But in researching this for 5 years I find *no* evidence that this is the case. Snowflakes can happen anywhere as long as the conditions are right. Life only comes from life. Information only comes from intelligence.

There’s an infinite chasm between information and non-information, between life and non-life. More here: http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/blog/infinite-chasm

@Steve:

Just as there can be only one president of a country, I believe there can be only one God of the universe.

In regards to Urantia and names of God, I think it would be very insightful to study the MANY names for God in the Bible. They all clearly refer to one God but describe many attributes. Not familiar with Sitchin.

Clothing: It’s one thing to need it to deal with the elements but more significant I think is the shame of nakedness. We are distinctly different from animals in that regard. In Genesis 1 it says, “And they were naked and unashamed.” I think that one sentence speaks volumes about the human condition. I think shame is the core negative emotion of all.

@Michelle: Thanks for having me. Let’s do a part 2!

By: Reddy Kilowatt - the Atma Jyoti Blog

Reddy Kilowatt - the Atma Jyoti Blog — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:21:33 +0000

The best proof of the existence of God is our innate urge towards knowing/loving God. Proving the existence of God is another question. Proof can only be given of an object, and God is the Eternal Subject. And those who are not ready for the spiritual ascent will find all kinds of reasons, often against reason, to deny God’s existence. But all will work out in the end, even for the most obtuse, even if it takes ages of creations to wake up.